Why U.S. Regulators Blocked the Launch of 5× Leveraged ETFs
1. A Major Decision That Shocked the ETF Market
In early December, U.S. regulators made a decision that quickly gained global attention: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) denied approval for a new group of 3× and 5× leveraged ETFs. Several well-known issuers—including Direxion, ProShares, Tidal Financial, and Volatility Shares—had submitted filings in October, hoping to bring high-leverage products tied to major technology stocks and leading cryptocurrencies to the U.S. market.
The SEC’s response was firm. In its notice, the agency stated that it has “significant concerns regarding ETFs that offer more than 200% leveraged exposure” to their underlying securities or indexes. This message signaled a clear red line for the industry.
2. What Leveraged ETF Issuers Were Trying to Launch
The proposed ETFs targeted some of the market’s most volatile and widely traded assets. Issuers planned to offer 3× and 5× daily return products based on:
-
Tesla, Nvidia, AMD, and Palantir
-
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Solana
These funds would aim to multiply the daily price movement—up or down—by as much as five times. However, with greater potential return comes dramatically greater risk.
3. Why the SEC Refuses to Allow More Than 2× Leverage
In the United States, single-stock leveraged ETFs are capped at 2× exposure. While older 3× index ETFs such as TQQQ or SOXL still exist, they are essentially “grandfathered in,” having been introduced before modern derivatives regulations were created.
Today, ETFs are governed by Rule 18f-4, introduced in 2022, which restricts a fund’s value-at-risk (VaR) to 200% of its net assets. A 5× ETF exceeds that limit by a wide margin. This rule is designed to ensure that derivative-heavy funds do not take on risks that could collapse the product—and potentially harm investors.
Issuers had hoped that the SEC’s recent approval of cryptocurrency ETFs and certain leveraged products indicated a more flexible stance. However, the sweeping rejection of every 3× and 5× filing made it clear that the regulator does not intend to loosen its standards.
4. The Hidden Dangers of 5× Daily Leverage
A 5× leveraged ETF is highly sensitive to market volatility. A 5% move in the underlying asset becomes a 25% move in the ETF. On a volatile trading day, these swings can compound rapidly, making the fund extremely unstable.
In some situations, a sharp market move can even force the ETF to delist within hours. One notable example occurred in October when AMD’s sudden stock surge caused a 3× inverse ETF listed in the U.K. to be delisted after only one trading day. Events like this highlight how leverage magnifies risk far more than many investors expect.
5. Growing Investor Appetite Despite the Risks
Even with the dangers of amplified volatility, investor interest is strong. According to Bloomberg, the global leveraged ETF market has grown to $162 billion, the largest size on record. Many investors—especially in South Korea—actively trade leveraged ETFs tied to tech stocks, semiconductors, and digital assets.
For retail traders hoping for rapid gains, leverage is appealing. However, the SEC’s latest rejection underscores that market demand alone cannot override regulatory safeguards.
6. What This Means for the Future of Leveraged ETFs
The SEC’s decision provides clarity for issuers and investors alike:
any ETF offering more than 200% leverage is unlikely to be approved under current regulations.
While financial markets continue to innovate, the agency remains committed to protecting investors from excessive downside risk. Asset managers may continue to explore creative ETF structures, but ultra-high-leverage products are effectively off the table—for now.
댓글
댓글 쓰기